Despite the CES Hype, It’s Better to Wait on That 4K TV - The New York Times

Tangentially, see Apple TV Brawl results: Apple solidly wins the 4K debate for now – and here’s why (9to5Mac)

"But after interviewing several technology companies and testing a premium Samsung 4K TV for more than a week, I was less than convinced that 2016 would be a good year to buy one of the sets. Televisions with the 4K feature remain expensive, ranging from $1,000 to tens of thousands of dollars. More important, the content available in the new 4K video resolution is sparse. And while images encoded in 4K do look better than normal high-definition ones, the differences aren’t jaw-dropping."

Despite the CES Hype, It’s Better to Wait on That 4K TV - The New York Times