The Google take on the WSJ’s take on Google’s take on net neutrality…
All of Google's colocation agreements with ISPs -- which we've done through projects called OpenEdge and Google Global Cache -- are non-exclusive, meaning any other entity could employ similar arrangements. Also, none of them require (or encourage) that Google traffic be treated with higher priority than other traffic. In contrast, if broadband providers were to leverage their unilateral control over consumers' connections and offer colocation or caching services in an anti-competitive fashion, that would threaten the open Internet and the innovation it enables.
Despite the hyperbolic tone and confused claims in Monday's Journal story, I want to be perfectly clear about one thing: Google remains strongly committed to the principle of net neutrality, and we will continue to work with policymakers in the years ahead to keep the Internet free and open.
Google Public Policy Blog: Net neutrality and the benefits of caching
1 comment:
Isn't net neutrality a bit of a myth to begin with? - Well, let's see if the WSJs Tuesday edition will have a correction of the story...
Post a Comment