Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Blogger Is Surprised by Uproar Over Obama Story, but Not Bitter

A bigger question, from my perspective: how did this "story" otherwise go four days with no mainstream press coverage?

Ms. Fowler told me in an interview Sunday night that she was initially reluctant to write about what Mr. Obama had said because she actually supports him -- which partly explains why she was at the fund-raiser in the first place and why there was a four-day delay between the event and the publication of her post. Ultimately, she said, she decided that if she didn’t write about it, she wouldn’t be worth her salt as a journalist.

[...]

The whole episode gives a revealing glimpse into yet even more ways in which the Internet is changing the coverage of politics. And Ms. Fowler says she is surprised that she is playing a role in this revolution.

"I'm 61," she said. "I can't believe I would be one of the people who's changing the world of media." But her experience raises questions about whether the roles, rules and expectations for journalists and bloggers are different. Can a person be both? Even Ms. Fowler acknowledged that "clearly everyone is going to be re-thinking how they handle this kind of thing."

Remember: information literacy is your friend...

Katharine Q. Seelye - On Line - The New York Times - Politics - Election 2008 - New York Times

Post a Comment