"Some history may help explain the situation. The new rule gives broadband providers what they’ve wanted for about a decade now: the right to speed up some traffic and degrade others. (With broadband, there is no such thing as accelerating some traffic without degrading other traffic.) We take it for granted that bloggers, start-ups, or nonprofits on an open Internet reach their audiences roughly the same way as everyone else. Now they won’t. They’ll be behind in the queue, watching as companies that can pay tolls to the cable companies speed ahead. The motivation is not complicated. The broadband carriers want to make more money for doing what they already do. Never mind that American carriers already charge some of the world’s highest prices, around sixty dollars or more per month for broadband, a service that costs less than five dollars to provide. To put it mildly, the cable and telephone companies don’t need more money."Goodbye, Net Neutrality; Hello, Net Discrimination : The New Yorker
Friday, April 25, 2014
Goodbye, Net Neutrality; Hello, Net Discrimination : The New Yorker
Excerpt from a Tim Wu perspective on the not-neutrality news
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment