Wednesday, December 22, 2010

The Hazards of Nerd Supremacy: The Case of WikiLeaks - Technology - The Atlantic

An excerpt from a timely Jaron Lanier reality check

The strategy of Wikileaks, as explained in an essay by Julian Assange, is to make the world transparent, so that closed organizations are disabled, and open ones aren't hurt. But he's wrong. Actually, a free flow of digital information enables two diametrically opposed patterns:  low-commitment anarchy on the one hand and absolute secrecy married to total ambition on the other.

While many individuals in Wikileaks would probably protest that they don't personally advocate radical ideas about transparency for everybody but hackers, architecture can force all our hands. This is exactly what happens in current online culture. Either everything is utterly out in the open, like a music file copied a thousand times or a light weight hagiography on Facebook, or it is perfectly protected, like the commercially valuable dossiers on each of us held by Facebook or the files saved for blackmail by Wikileaks.

The Hazards of Nerd Supremacy: The Case of WikiLeaks - Technology - The Atlantic

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.